Emily Ratajkowski tattooed her son
Emily Ratajkowski posted photos of tattoos with her son's name and infuriated fans who noticed something unusual in an instant.
Emily Ratajkowski is enjoying motherhood since her son Sylvester Apollo Bear was born a year ago, and many of her fans are regularly thrilled to see any news regarding her little son. However, a few days ago, Emily shared photos on her Instagram that infuriated many, all thanks to the fact that some concluded that one-year-old Sylvester was tattooed.
The famous model posted a photo showing three tattoos with the inscription 'SLY'. That is Sylvester's nickname, and although it was not clear from the post on whose body parts were the tattoos, there were many who were convinced that one of the tattoos looked as if it was on a baby's skin.
View this post on Instagram
'I hope that child was not tattooed, because if so, it is not appropriate,' was one of the comments. 'I think tattooing a baby is a little too much,' says another, and on the same track was the comment 'Isn't it too early to get your baby tattooed?'. The avalanche of negative comments continued to grow, and some even commented on how her child should be taken away from her because of this.
The other picture Emily posted alongside the photo with the controversial tattoos is a joint photo of her and her son, and with pink cheeks and blue eyes, the toddler stole all the attention.
Although the public fell in love with Sylvester at first sight, this is not the first time Emily was criticized for her parenting decisions and methods. 'When my husband and I told our friends that I'm pregnant, their first question after' Congratulations' is almost always' Do you know what gender you want? ' We like to answer that we will not know the gender until our child reaches the age of 18 and until they tell us what gender they are ', she concluded and provoked violent reactions.
Despite her rarely liberal views, it's pretty unbelievable that she and Sebastian would really decide to tattoo a child, almost as much as they could find a tattoo artist who would agree to do so, but if Emily has achieved something with this post, it's to leave without answer many who still wonder whose exact tattoos are seen in the pictures. Who knows, maybe we'll find out someday!
